Brian: > It would be a bad standard if it required everyone to change all > their old pages every time the standard changed.
Where did I say it was required? I just said that pages that are that old probably have other problems... however, I suspect that the problem here is badly written HTML, rather than merely old. > is what to do in that case? You've got a completely free hand for > rendering illegal HTML, so you might as well pick something useful. There should be something to mark that an image existed, in my opinion. Maybe a command line option which defaults to "[img]" is the way to go, but dropping [img] markers is nasty. -- MJR
