> 
> > What I looked for was a way to protect the document, assuming only minor
> > changes to the viewer or the document itself by an attacker.
> 
>       Given the recent "awareness" of security issues lately, driven
> mostly by the media, let's choose terms a bit differently here. How about
> "obscure" the document, instead of "protect". That way we don't claim to
> hold any security claims on the software itself.
>
> /d

Good thought.

Or even, help honest people stay honest!  Positive thinking!

Bill

Reply via email to