> Interesting review of another competitor on Infosync, iSilo 3.1. The
> three things I notice are: CSS support, real tables, and support for
> reading DOC pdbs and .txt files on a memory card.
iSilo has a totally different userbase and needs. For us, I think
the top things we need to look into supporting, in order of precedence are:
1.) Cookies and "cookie jar" support
2.) Tables (*NO* horizontzal scrollbar, please)
3.) DOC and txt formatted content
The rest is icing, really. Having CSS support is going to really
make things ugly, since you have a lot of play to deal with, lots and lots
and lots of parsing (like pixel-by-pixel alignment, stuff like that. I can
see CSS support for minor things like fonts, colors, but where CSS gets into
play with table frames, margin widths, sub-pixel alignment, forget it in
Plucker).
I say we focus on cookies and tables, that willl please greater than
half of our requesting userbase.
d.
