-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Frankly, I never figured anyone would ever put owner_id_build in a
> configuration file, but would only use it from the command-line. I forgot
> just how paranoid a lot of folks out there are.
I notice the latest Python distiller still uses owner_id_build in
Writer.py. Is that what we're sticking with for the config files syntax now?
I only ask because I have to parse that config file, and I need to
know what the Python version is passing in. Locally, I'm using owner_id in
the config and owner-id as an argument to the spider, but the Python one
differs.
Just let me know what you want to use, I'll use it for your tool.
d.
perldoc -qa.j | perl -lpe '($_)=m("(.*)")'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.1.92 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9jI9BkRQERnB1rkoRAp2mAKDTJwNZgokg0FIDL+ZDLhkwOCSQkQCff4Az
yBAYN7zunwFjxzHCtTSuaCU=
=rjNW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
