> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael > Nordstrom > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 1:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Plucker 1.41 beta oddities > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2003, Dennis McCunney wrote: > > Yes, I have a lot of Plucker documents -- several hundred, > > occupying about 55MB of space on the card -- but 1.2 handles this an > > order of magnitude faster than 1.41. > > 1.2 might have handled it much faster, but it also handled it in the > wrong way making the document list more or less corrupt after a while.
I'll take your word for that. What I don't understand is why 1.41 is an order of magnitude slower. What all is it doing that it wasn't doing before? > Now, you might prefer a fast, but corrupt list handling; I rather have > a list handling that is correct ;-) The speed issues I can't comment > on at the moment; I haven't tested it with that many Plucker > documents, yet (I "only" have 80-90 Plucker documents on my CF card.) I prefer proper list handling, but faster than 1.41. :) Do you see Plucker 1.41 hadling document lists more slowly than 1.2 on your device? If so, a _lot_ more slowly? > However, I won't be able to do much Plucker work for the next 2-3 > months or so; the work that pays my bills has a much higher > priority... Paying work gets priority. I wasn't expecting a fast fix. I'm more interested in _why_ it slowed down so much. > /Mike ______ Dennis _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
