Alan Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > take http://nelson.oit.unc.edu/~alanh/tmp/plucker-feature-matrix.html to > use on their site, I've added a Creative Commons license to it. Or would
You are discriminating against commercial use, so I think this licence is not very nice. Plucker can be used legally for commercial use, so why not its documentation? Also, it cannot be relicensed to allow it to merge with other material. > the GNU FDL be more appropriate? http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html I think that something like the Design Science Licence, or GPL with clear specification of source form, would be more appropriate. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Thought: "Changeset algebra is really difficult." _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
