I now have the cache initializer check for Prefs()->imageCaching. It would
be easy enough to make it a compile-time option, too.
--
Dr. Alexander R. Pruss
Department of Philosophy
Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20057-1133 U.S.A.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
online papers and home page: www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
"Philosophiam discimus non ut tantum sciamus, sed ut boni efficiamur."
- Paul of Worczyn (1424)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hawks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: caching
> ---Reply to mail from Alexander R. Pruss about caching
>
> > We should remove the prefs() image caching option because it doesn't
seem to
> > do anything more since the Prefs()->cacheImages option is ignored by
> > everything:
> [...]
> > Am I missing something?
>
> That's partly why I suggested that it be a compile-time option (like
> multiimage). Then it could be dis-abled in the light version of the
viewer.
>
> ---End reply
>
> Christopher R. Hawks
> HAWKSoft
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> We use Linux for all our mission-critical applications. Having the source
> code means that we are not held hostage by anyone's support department.
> -- Russell Nelson, President of Crynwr Software
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> plucker-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
>
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
