Matsumoto, Masakazu: > No, I am not intending to replace it. > I'd like to add another choice. > It is only a matter of user interface > and almost all codes are already > there. Not so many work was needed. > (I've already done implementation > in my copy.)
Michael Nordstrom: > Then make it a compile time option... Do you mean so that the minimal build can be as streamlined as possible? In the full (and probably the medium) build, this should be configured by the user at run-time. I'm not sure it needs to change per-channel, but there are clearly strong user preferences both ways -- and I suspect that most people do not recompile a new binary, let alone slog through the source to see which options they could set. Incidentally, are preference changes now somewhat backwards-compatible? As in, can newer formats read the old and assume "default" for new variables, and can older readers read the new but ignore those "extra" bits at the end? I suspect that easier preferences updating might reduce some of the concerns about new options. -jJ _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
