On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Robert OConnor wrote:
> > anyway in the U.S. at least fonts aren't
> > copyrightable.
>
> Just for the archives, I believe the stipulation is that bitmap fonts
> aren't copyrightable.
>
> Whether the pilRC textfile that is used to generate a bitmap font can be
> reused without permission, I don't know.
Well, it's not a matter of re-using but re-generating. A derivative work
of a non-copyrightable item either has no copyright or has copyright owned
by the person (i.e., us) who produced the derivative work.
Alex
--
Dr. Alexander R. Pruss || e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Philosophy Department || online papers and home page:
Georgetown University || www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85
Washington, DC 20057 ||
U.S.A. ||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Philosophiam discimus non ut tantum sciamus, sed ut boni efficiamur."
- Paul of Worczyn (1424)
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
