On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:12:26AM -0500, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > What do you think about extending plucker to handle unicode better? > > (i.e. making it usable for ISO-8859-2 people, since for them > > plucker does not work at all)? > > Sorry for my naivete, but isn't it just a matter of dropping in an > ISO-8859-2 font, and using jPluck which includes conversion between > encodings?
yes, it works, but that was what I meant by an "ugly hack", and it does not solve the situation if you are making plucker document out of www site that uses different encodings. Besides, I did not found any ISO-8859-2 fonts (I think I am going to make some as an interim measure, btw antialiased fonts look really ugly when used on colour background) -- ----------------------------------------------------------- | Radovan Garab�k http://melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__ garabik @ melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk | ----------------------------------------------------------- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread! _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
