On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> Don't forget, that is you want enough generality, you have to allow
> 1->N scheme (e.g. one input char can be transliterated as a string
> of more characters).
Yes, but then the searching will be significantly slower, or we will have
to have more than one search function.
There is no harm doing 1->1. It just might mean a transliteration scheme
that the user will have to actually learn and that is non-obvious. (E.g.,
"q" = "Iu", etc.)
But I'll make the format such as to allow for 1->N extension in the
future.
Alex
--
Dr. Alexander R. Pruss || e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Philosophy Department || online papers and home page:
Georgetown University || www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85
Washington, DC 20057 ||
U.S.A. ||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Philosophiam discimus non ut tantum sciamus, sed ut boni efficiamur."
- Paul of Worczyn (1424)
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
