On Thu, 20 May 2004 at 08:54, Lambert, Mark wrote:
> > But once the document is decrypted, will you need to
> > reencrypt the plucker format version? Would you need to
> > include the CC information in that too somehow, to discourage
> > beaming? (As part of the owner string? Just as text?)
>
> This was mentioned before and it might suffice. I would hesitate to
> include the CC information though. It would deter copying, but it would
> also get left around because of backups, etc. and I am very wary of
> identity and CC theft.
Wouldn't it be simple enough to: unpluck; edit HTML removing CC info;
pluck again?
Doesn't seem like that much of a deterrent to me....
-alan
--
Alan Hoyle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.alanhoyle.com/
"I don't want the world, I just want your half." -TMBG
Get Horizontal, Play Ultimate.
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
