Bernd Sieker wrote: > I preferred the old 2-line overlap. It allows for more fluent reading > of longer texts. No overlap is really bad, since very often a line > will be altogether unreadable. I think the overlap should be > configurable to 0, one or two lines (standard text size). Agreed, Bernd, configurable would be good. Personally I find that the two-line overlap meant that I was always reading those lines twice. I guess a zero-line overlap could be a problem when the viewer sometimes shows a few pixels (part of a line) at either the top or bottom of the screen. Then the viewer would have to decide whether it had shown that line already or not when the user paged down. If it decided that it had shown that line, the user wouldn't get to read it at all. I know that some other viewers like iSilo and cSpotrun don't show those half-lines (at least that's my recollection), so maybe it would be possible to censor them out and resolve the problem that way. -- David
