I agree with David on this one! I would want to control this as a user, otherwise I _will_ be taking a look at your source code ;-)I understand your needs are different, but the design approach needs to be local, and self-contained, not centralized on a server. Remember, the design of Plucker keeps the CLIENT in control, not the server.This way JPluck (or any other parser) can automatically lower the connection count if it is set too high by the user, or introduce a delay.Ick. If I set or override a parameter, I EXPECT it to stay overridden, and not reverted by some tool I can't control upstream.A parser fetches this registry periodically to refresh its local copy.As an option, defaulted to off, and enabled by the user, perhaps.
David A. Desrosiers wrote:
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 - running fro... Laurens M. Fridael
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 - running... Wesley Mason
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 - ru... Laurens M. Fridael
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Laurens M. Fridael
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 David A. Desrosiers
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Laurens M. Fridael
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 David A. Desrosiers
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Laurens M. Fridael
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 David A. Desrosiers
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Laurens M. Fridael
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Edward Rayl
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Wesley Mason
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Edward Rayl
- Re: JPluck 0.9 prerelease 2 Jonathan Saunders
- JPluckc Command line options and Cron Script Wesley Mason
- RE: JPluckc Command line options and Cron Script Wesley Mason
- Re: JPluckc Command line options and Cron Script Laurens M. Fridael
- Re: JPluckc Command line options and Cron Scr... Wesley Mason
- Re: JPluckc Command line options and Cron Scr... Wesley Mason

