Hello David
>> umm ... they're not unrelated to plucker. > > I was referring to things that contains completely unparsable > content, like incorrectly-nested tags, that god-awful pods:// and avantgo:// > scheme, MS-HTML, and other obvious non-HTML things found in a page. How much > work do we as developers have to do, just to compensate for something that > isn't even our problem to fix? When bugs are reported for things like broken > links, etc. and other stuff, what do we do? Add a new patch or fix for each > one? Please NO! If you would try to fix every possible bug that any HTML-page may have, we would end up in having a gigabyte-monster-program only to view a HTML-Page offline. Who can really be interested in such a overkill. And the program will grow with every version of IE... Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
