On 02/07/2013 10:10 PM, James Dugger wrote:
I have a software RAID10 array (4-1TB drives) that I have assembled in a
kvm vm on Proxmox (Debian Squeeze 6.0).  The HDDs were mapped to the vm
using virtio.  The array once created and started in the vm (during
resync) started throwing an I/O error on one of the disks.  It kept
repeating the error until I stopped the array.  At the host level I ran
smartctl on all drives and they all passed inspection.

The drives are not all the same brand.  The array is made up of 1
Seagate Barracuda, 2 WD Blacks, and 1 Hitachi.  The Seagate is an
Advanced Format with sector size  (logical/physical) equal to
512B/4096B.  The other drives are standard format 512B/512B.  All drives
are configured as GPT and have been partioned (using parted) to be
aligned as follows:

Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name         Flags
  1      1049kB  1000GB  1000GB               udata_raid2  raid

Is it possible that the physical sector size of 4096B of the Seagate
drive is causing the problem?  I don't believe that the I/O error was on
the Seagate (I can't recall which it was on at the time).

The HDD's where mapped to virtio devices using the following:

qm <vmID> virtio# /dev/disk/by-id/ata-<disk name>

Any thoughts?

--
James


I would initially suspect the AF drive, only because it's fundamentally a little different. That could be an errant suspicion though.

I have a Seagate Barracuda ES.2 drive (500G, date 09404) which passes all tests I've thrown at it (smartctl, badblocks), yet it throws errors when it's put into a software raid-1. I've taken the approach which says, "if it doesn't work that way, don't do it that way". ;) IOW, I'm not using that drive with raid.

Can you identify which drive is throwing the errors?

(Hope to see you at tommorrow's meeting)

--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Reply via email to