Yes!! What a great thread.
My new box has a 3rd generation i3 and 8gb of RAM. It is LAMP exclusively -
public facing web server. Over kill for what I am doing. In a nutshell I
should run the 64bit version. This is an experiment and a vehicle for
learning. So far it has exceeded my expectations.
Thank you to all that responded, this thread holds a wealth of knowledge!!
I'm starting a new thread on how AMD and Intel manage memory.
Thanks again for such a great thread!!
------------------------
Keith Smith
--- On Sat, 6/1/13, Stephen <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Stephen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 32bit vs 64bit Linux
To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, June 1, 2013, 1:18 PM
Thats some good reading. This week has been a great week. They just added my
router to ddwrt. Ubuntu touch just got built for my phone... And i might be
able to get away with a Linux work environment...
On Saturday, June 1, 2013, Lisa Kachold wrote:
Stephen,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Stephen <[email protected]> wrote:
How well does it play with Cisco as an alternative to the anyconnect
application?You don't *have* to use the Cisco provided client (as you already
well know) there's VPNC as well, which works *very* well under linux, and is
insanely easy to build, configure and run.
Generally, OpenVPN is a SSL VPN and Cisco uses IPSEC, but that doesn't mean
it's not possible. Most all of Cisco's newer VPN offerings support SSL VPN.
Do you have a specific Cisco VPN device in mind? Or do you mean any Cisco VPN
device?
If you mean a VPN 3000 concentrator, I would say no.
If you mean an ASA device, I would say yes.
If you mean a IOS device, I would say maybe. (Depending on version and a good
deal of tinkering)
If you mean a PIX device, I would say maybe. (Depending on version and a good
deal of banging head against wall)
Technically "it's not supported". But the "not supported" tag (primarily used
to reduce costs of large businesses trying to train their non-technical
customers to use anything more complex than an off/on button) is clearly not
any limitation for linux people?
Just go with a Cisco compatible client!
OpenConnect is still a very good product, and I would choose it over Cisco's
client any day! http://www.infradead.org/openconnect/
Also, you can allow OpenVPN through the cisco firewall and run both IPSEC and
SSL VPN, by getting a nice OpenVPNAS Virtual Appliance, you will be up and
running in 1/2 hour, plus your users can go right to the VPN server and
authenticate and download their clients without any big fuss. Just because you
have a Cisco VPN available, doesn't mean you must use that IPSEC virtual
private tunnel exclusively. Once you allow SSL VPN, you can use a quick setup
OpenVPN AS Server:
Here's what the OpenVPN Access Server looks like:
https://12.159.65.84/?src=connect PLUG HackFest VPN services for Labs in the
DeVry Rack at OneNeck Hosting.
Reference: http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/Installation Reference
vpnc Ubuntu:
http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/information-services/services/computing/desktop-personal/vpn/vpn-cisco-client/vpn-cisco-ubuntu
Cisco VPN FAQ:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/products_qanda_item09186a00801c2dbe.shtml
Examples of 64bit OS Cisco client issues:
http://micro.stanford.edu/wiki/How_to_install_and_configure_the_Cisco_VPN_client_on_a_Linux_computer#64-bit_operating_system_errors
On May 31, 2013 5:23 PM, "Lisa Kachold" <[email protected]> wrote:
Stephen,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stephen Rufle <[email protected]> wrote:
My only compatibly issue was getting
the VPN tunnel that my job uses to work in 64 bit.
Juniper network-connect software on Ubuntu not sure what version,
but it was around 2011. My advice is to do a 64 bit install and
then do a tests with your personal list of high priority software.
OpenVPN works wonderfully with Juniper VPN's; completely supplanting the
Network-Connect application.
http://vpnthebestvpn.com/vpn1/juniper-vpn-64-bit.html
On 5/31/13 9:28 AM, keith smith wrote:
Hi,
Even though I have 64bit hardware I always install the
32bit version of Linux. I do so because of the past
discussions on this list that made me believe the 32bit OS
was better because 64bit caching is actually slower due to
the requirement that the cache be filled to a certain
point before it is moved. I think I recall something
about the amount of RAM having some effect here also.
Using a 32bit version over a 64bit version seems counter
intuitive, however that is what I have taken away from
these conversations about 32bit vs 64bit Linux.
I'm using CentOS 6.x on a LAMP server that gets a low
amount of traffic. However I may make the jump to Linux
on my desktop this summer. (this will be my 3rd attempt to
become M$ free except one VM so I can use IE for testing)
I think all of my hardware is 64bit.
So that begs the question, is 32bit better than 64bit or
do I not understand the issue?
Thank you for your feedback.
Keith
------------------------
Keith Smith
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--
(503) 754-4452 Android
(623) 239-3392 Skype
(623) 688-3392 Google Voice
**
it-clowns.com
Chief Clown
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--
(503) 754-4452 Android
(623) 239-3392 Skype
(623) 688-3392 Google Voice
**
it-clowns.com
Chief Clown
--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from rolling
over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
Stephen
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
