Yeah, no doubt. He wouldn't stick up for his buddy? The guy he supports? Or because of legal reasons? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnPI7B7ZS9M http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13151889 http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2013/01/24/what-mark-zuckerberg-and-chris-christie-have-in-common its also [almost] word for word the same as Zuckerbergs. https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10100828955847631[1] on a similar note, its not far fetched that they would be legally required to deny access, like an NSL... I think 3rd party auditors would calm fears too. Eric On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Stephen <[email protected][2]> wrote: Another snip, this is actually an interesting response given out conversation http://googleblog.blogspot.com/[3] and thanks for the link on burnerphone. that is indeed interesting. [email protected][4] http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss[5] -------- [1] https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10100828955847631 [2] mailto:[email protected] [3] http://googleblog.blogspot.com/ [4] mailto:[email protected] [5] http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
