I have hard drives smaller than that. Nice!!
------------------------
Keith Smith
--- On Wed, 6/12/13, Bryan O'Neal <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Bryan O'Neal <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: AMD vs Intel memory managemement
To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2013, 6:12 PM
Yes - I am not saying my entire farm has that much ram. You can get away with
much, much less, but I have servers that go that high.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:49 PM, keith smith <[email protected]> wrote:
Did I read that right you have 768GB of RAM?
------------------------
Keith Smith
--- On Wed, 6/12/13, Bryan O'Neal <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Bryan O'Neal <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: AMD vs Intel memory managemement
To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2013, 5:45 PM
This is kinda new to me - Just so I am clear - unganged systems would perform
better if I have say - a caching system with limited threads each pined to a
specific core (we do this for processor cache anyway) while ganged systems
would perform better it I was spinning up a new thread for each request and had
a large amount (say 768GB) of ram running something like PostgreSQL where
threads are being fired up and down many thousands of times a second but the
data
they seek is mostly in main memory.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Stephen <[email protected]> wrote:
On-board bios usually will not allocate that much however. And by usually will
not I mean I have never sen it do so, even in the days of ghetto ram thieving
by graphics chip-sets.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Eric Shubert <[email protected]> wrote:
On 06/03/2013 01:46 PM, Nathan England wrote:
But why does CentOS not register all of my memory? Why less than 3/4 of it?
Perhaps the bios has allocated a chunk of it to onboard video?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from rolling
over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
