What you can do is disable DHCP on the second router (The one not connected to your ISP). Then connect the LAN port of the second router to the LAN on the First router. It is important that you have the DHCP service disabled on the second router! Do not use the Internet/WAN port of the second router.

Gilbert

On 7/18/2014 2:51 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
is there a way turn NAT off in the second router?

:-)~MIKE~(-:


On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Michael Havens <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    you are correct. that is what I've done and what is going on. I
    don't have a switch.... only the other router. I'm mad at
    myself..... I had a switch but got rid of it before I moved to FL.

    :-)~MIKE~(-:


    On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr.
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        What I think you are doing is using NAT between your 2
        networks. Below is my approximation of your system patched
        together from your comments...
        1. You have the router that is connected to your ISP. It is
        performing NAT and handing out a private network to anything
        on its LAN and WIFI interfaces.
        2. You have a second router that has its Internet/WAN
        interface connected to one of the LAN interfaces on the first
        router. It is also performing NAT and handing out a second
        private network on its LAN and WIFI interfaces.

        You WOULD be able to connect via SSH from a device connected
        to the router listed in point 2 to a device connected to the
        router listed in point 1. You WOULD NOT be able to connect
        from the device connected to the router listed in point 2 FROM
        a device connected to the router listed in point 1 due to NAT.

        There are ways to get beyond this and only have one network
        utilizing 2 SOHO routers. I would always recommend for anyone
        who has limited network experience to only use one router and
        use a combination of switches and access points to extend
        wired LANs and provide better WIFI coverage. If the setup is
        how I described, you may have other issues due to DOUBLE NAT
        that you just have not recognized yet.

        Gilbert


        On 7/18/2014 12:30 PM, Michael Havens wrote:

            telnet localhost 22 from the server received no answer
            from the client
            telnet 192.168.1.101 22 from the client received no answer
            from the server

            I'll get back to you about the research project
             (and as a private message)

            :-)~MIKE~(-:


        ---------------------------------------------------
        PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
        http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss





---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Reply via email to