How many [thousand] hours on the drive? I think you're gambling if you have more than 26,000 hours (3 years) and ESPECIALLY if it's really a Hitachi drive. Seagate bought Hitachi recently, and from what I've seen, are selling used Hitachi drives as "new" Seagate drives - check the model number and the run hours!

Hard drives are killing me this year - I've spent over 80 hours in rework because of failed drives - especially with Seatachi drives (see above). 80 hours of rework at no pay is a painful lesson.

Regards,

George Toft

On 9/11/2014 4:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Greetings!


I have a 500GB Seagate ST3500312CS SATA drive salvaged from a decommissioned 
DVR. The DVR's OS said SMART status OK. The latest Seatools disk utility from 
the Seagate website says the drive is A-OK (short test, long test, full erase, 
re-test) no errors found.

However, the Gnome disk utility in Mint 17 says 'Threshold not exceeded' and 
'Disk is OK, 178 bad sectors'.

Some other SMART attributes displayed:

ID1             Read Error Rate: 152141757
ID5     Reallocated Sector Count: 178 sectors
ID187   Reported Uncorrectable Errors: 0 sectors
ID198   Uncorrectable Sector Count: 0 sectors
ID199   UDMA CRC Error Rate: 0


GSmart Control 0.8.7 is reading the same thing, 178 sectors, but also says it's 
OK.

running an e2fsck from gparted reports 0 bad blocks.

I've also retested in another machine with different cables to minimize the 
possibility of bogus hardware or BIOS issues, but the results remain the same.

Seagate's website has a FAQ that says their tools should be the final say as 
they're designed to work correctly with their drives.

Normally a bad sector or two wouldn't bother me, I have drives that have been 
running for years like that. I just keep backups fresh and check for bad sector 
growth. A few bad sectors is within spec and that's why HDD's have a reserved 
area. Yet somehow 178 sectors seems like a lot.

Should I trust this drive for anything more than a paperweight?

Should I trust anything with the words 'smart', 'affordable', or 'free' in the 
name?  ;]


Thanks!


--Kenn
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Reply via email to