I would say tune mysql and then use xcache instead of memcached. This is the route that I prefer to go. Since you already have memcached working, use it.
Jason > On Dec 12, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Keith Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm working on a dual quad server with 16GB RAM. Free says it is using about > 10GB. > > It serves several websites, the main one is a very active Drupal website. As > you know Drupal is a resource hog. This one is even more so since there is > tons of modules adding to the mix. > > I am told I should tune MySql instead of using memcache. > > The default max_allowed_packet is 1M. Druapl requires 16M I set it at 32M. > I page load is much faster and this is with memcache loaded and configured. > Memcache is currently configured to 64M of RAM for caching. Seems very small. > > Drupal uses innoDB and I am reading that increasing the > innodb_buffer_pool_size will lead to a bust in performance. I assume this > will reduce IO and the server load should go down. > > There is 4GB of free RAM and the server has not used any swap since it was > rebooted last night. The innodb_buffer_pool_size default value is 128MB. > Since I do not know what to expect I am thinking of setting it to 1GB and see > what happens and work up from there. > > Any feedback is much appreciated!! > > Keith > > -- > Keith Smith > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
