On 08/19/2016 05:51 PM, Michael wrote:
but it has 17 control points set.
It doesn't matter how many control points you have set if you have
parallax distortion between the 2 images. I've had images with 80
control points between them and it still can't stitch them successfully
because the control points don't makes sense because of the distortion.
You said I could rotate it in hugin? How does one do that?
In the preview, go to the MOve/Drag tab and drag the image with the
right mouse button and it will rotate.
Brian Cluff
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Brian Cluff <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'd say that still fits with my answer. If you have one image
that it can't align it will be sitting on the preview in it's
default orientation.
Brian Cluff
On 08/19/2016 11:31 AM, Michael wrote:
I don't know if this is the problem but:
All of the pictures were taken in portrait orientation. In the
control point tab all of the images except one are in a landscape
orientation. The one image that is in that orientation is the
last image in that series and it is the image that is stretched.
Does that have any bearing in this problem?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Brian Cluff <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Double check that you do indeed have control points between
every single image. It sounds like you might have a single
image that isn't connected in any way, or maybe only
partially connected and when it stitches it end up placed on
top of all your other images. The preview is just an OpenGL
preview of what you can expect to get but it works
differently than the final stitch so you can often times get
different results if your control points aren't all perfect.
You can check your layout tab in the fast panorama preview
(the GL preview button) and play with the scale. The layout
tab will quickly show you how your images are connected
together and how well. If you have any images that are just
floating out there with no lines then that's your culprit.
You will also want to look for images with very thin lines
going between the images. Thin lines represent weak
connections and you will need to increase the number of
control points between your images.
There is also a high probability, since you said you hand
held the camera when you took the pictures that even though
you picked matching spots in the image that there is no way
for the program to warp the images correctly due to parallax
distortion. If your images are of the inside of a room,
that's almost certainly the case.
Finding the no parallax point:
http://www.johnhpanos.com/epcalib.htm
<http://www.johnhpanos.com/epcalib.htm>
You will have to get one of these and it will have to be
precisely setup correctly for your camera if you are going to
take pictures indoors. There is just no other way to do it:
https://www.amazon.com/SUNWAYFOTO-Panoramic-Horizontal-Vertical-Sunway/dp/B00RYNDMOC/ref=sr_1_11
<https://www.amazon.com/SUNWAYFOTO-Panoramic-Horizontal-Vertical-Sunway/dp/B00RYNDMOC/ref=sr_1_11>
https://www.amazon.com/DSLRKIT-Panoramic-Indexing-Rotator-Bracket/dp/B00PN8DY7K/ref=sr_1_14
<https://www.amazon.com/DSLRKIT-Panoramic-Indexing-Rotator-Bracket/dp/B00PN8DY7K/ref=sr_1_14>
https://www.amazon.com/FOTOMATE-degree-Panoramic-Bracket-Cameras/dp/B00PQH4OY0/ref=sr_1_32
<https://www.amazon.com/FOTOMATE-degree-Panoramic-Bracket-Cameras/dp/B00PQH4OY0/ref=sr_1_32>
There are a lot more out there, but these 3 are some of the
most affordable ones. I've got 2 of them; one made by
Manfrotto that cost a lot of money and is built like a tank
and I think it might weigh as much as a tank as well. I've
also got a Nodal Ninja that I really like that weighs a lot
less, which is why I got it, and does an equally good job for
a fraction of the money.
Brian Cluff
On 08/19/2016 06:27 AM, Michael wrote:
I'm trying to do a panorama. It found at least 17 control
points between images 0,1 and 2,3 and 3,4 (each pair had
17). I had to go in and put control points for images 1 and
2. That was fine but when I stitch it all together the
picture on the ball seems fine but the resultin panorama
image is one of the five photos of the panorama stretched
out. Any ideas how to fix this?
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
<http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
<http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss>
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
<http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss>
--------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss
mailing list - [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
<http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss>
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
