On 6/19/07, Judd Pickell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh wow.. hahahah.. that would move it a fair bit.. :)
On 6/19/07, Alex LeDonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/19/07, Alex LeDonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd have you add me, but it would put the mean out past apache
junction. :)
> > >
> > > -A
> On 6/19/07, Judd Pickell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > could be worse, I live in Tucson, I can only imagine what that would
> > do to your mean.. ;)
>
> Tuscon? Very little... maybe move it a mile or two southeast. I live in
Atlanta.
>
> -A
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]
Maybe it would make sense to compute, instead of a mean,
some kind of "weighted" location,
(like they do when mixing "more than two" navigational aid
signals e.g.) (well, it is done for VOR and DME - I am
not sure about GPS...)
where the weight given to each signal, is inversely proportional
to some power, like the square, of the distance away from
where the "weighted location" would be, "without" that
input datum ("data item").
((I guess you'd have to use a mean or something to get "started"...))
--
Mike Schwartz
Glendale AZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
