Listen, Everyone! Currently, in America, (and in Arizona) the DHS contracts with monitoring staff who, without a warrant, based on monitoring criteria obtained through courts, public service agencies, public complaints, conflicts and criminal record forecasting (that can go back more than 20 years) daily have cell phone transmissions switch forwarded to a conference group of paid listeners. The data that they obtain goes into DHS databases. Their presence can be heard, they often communicate directly with those they monitor where volume permits. Call clarity is effected; communication intuition is triangulated (talking to what you perceive the frame of reference of your listeners as); privacy is non-existent.
The impact of having your private conversations overheard, your professional conversations applied to non-technical listeners and constant scrutiny to innocent individuals (as well as guilty) is huge. There has been no study, since the beginning of federal or criminal surveillance that proves it reduces crime. Duress, in fact, has been shown in many studies to create an atmosphere that potentiates what it is supposed to suppress. If you forward your email to your phone or visa vis, they intercept that also, completely without a warrant. Blanket warrants exist for various types of crimes that they use without any due process. There is no way other than refusing to carry your own monitoring device (cell phone) that an individual once targeted into this big money, multi-agency DHS monitoring program, can be constitutionally protected for privacy and free communications. Hundreds of thousands of individuals are currently under this scrutiny without ever volunteering. There are no constitutional rights in America. Why should FISA for Federal travelers or interesting parties be any different? Turn up your cell BlueTooth Volume and/or get J2EE recording PDA add-in applications for your cell phones. With many speaker cell phones monitoring staff can open your phone for monitoring even when you are not talking on it! An Asterisk Server can be built on Linux also where we can forward or provide ring groups that also record all two-way communications, while also providing dial-around to offset minute costs (get unlimited Call-HOME to the Asterisk number for $15.00 a month). Those recordings can be fed into a voice analysis stress tester to show lies/truth, can be amplified to hear the monitoring group conference discussions in very low volume while you talk. Those recordings in the State of Arizona are legal to publish, should you happen to trap the DHS. YouTube for RIGHTS? Be prepared to meet with an onslaught of federal interference in your "constitutional rights", however! Catch Me: UAT 10:00-16:00 INSTALL FEST http://plug.phoenix.az.us/node/381 (503)754-4452 Blackberry || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent via EDVO/CDMA Dell Latitude PII - Kubuntu 7.10 Mozilla/OpenOffice --- On Fri, 6/27/08, keith smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: keith smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Arizona's Harry Mitchell + Gabrielle Giffords on FISA Bill Watch List To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 2:35 PM These searches will not pass the test of the Bill of Rights. They will go the same way the DC gun law went. ------------------------ Keith Smith (520) 207-9877 PHP Programmer --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Joshua Zeidner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Joshua Zeidner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Arizona's Harry Mitchell + Gabrielle Giffords on FISA Bill Watch List To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 1:00 PM BERKELEY, CA—Last week, on June 20, the House of Representatives approved a compromise bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA). The bill sets new electronic surveillance rules that effectively shield telecommunications companies from lawsuits resulting from the government's warrantless eavesdropping on phone calls and viewing of emails of private citizens in the U.S. Approximately 40 lawsuits have been filed with potential damages totaling in the billions of dollars. On March 14 of this year the House passed an amendment that rejected retroactive immunity for phone carriers who helped the National Security Agency carry out the illegal wiretapping program without proper warrants. Ninety-four House Democrats voted in favor of this measure--rejecting immunity--on March 14, then 'changed' to vote in favor of the June 20 House bill--approving immunity. "Why did these ninety-four House members have a change of heart?" asked Daniel Newman, executive director of MAPLight.org, "Their constituents deserve answers." http://www.maplight.org/FISA_June08 -- - http://www.joshuazeidner.com/ --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
