Eh, my last experience with setting up replication with postgres was
not very fun. I have used Slony, and pgcluster, and pgpool. Setting up
reliable replication with MySQL is a snap, and doesn't require any extra
tools or daemons.
In the past the biggest advantage of postgres over mysql was that
postgres supported triggers, views, etc. But since MySQL 5 I'm not sure
what postgres has that MySQL does not.
If anything phpMyAdmin is 10 times more useful than pgmyadmin :-)
-Charles
Joshua Zeidner wrote:
Actually we just got through that one... It seems that it is easier
to set up, but the supported concepts for replication in PostGres are
stronger. PG offered this feature very early on.
-jmz
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Charles Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I shall now make a blanket statement such as; "It is easier to setup
replication with MySQL". :P
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
