just because one is paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you :-) On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM, James Mcphee <[email protected]> wrote: > Vigilant, but not paranoid. XSS exists for a reason. A better solution > IMHO would be to require the remote content to be signed by a particular > source or something along those lines. Just my 2 cents. > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Stephen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> given Lisa's previous rants I'm thinking both, and she would be right. >> >> it is in everyone's best interest to be vigilant. >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Alex Dean <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On May 15, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote: >> > >> >> it's IMPORTANT to realize that WE ALL MUST BE SECURITY EXPERTS >> > >> > Who is 'we'? Programmers/admins/hackers, or the general public?
-- A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button. Stephen --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
