Stephen wrote: > For me with linux/windows i woudl create Fat 32 on volumes 2gb or less > or ntfs on volumes larger. > > not the best choice but it is the most simple and portable one. fat > will even allow OSX compatability. > > anything more complicated tar-gzip and a portable version of 7zip or > winrar if you need to keep complex file structures and permissions. >
Right, but ntfs is strictly nonfree. Hans wants to get around ntfs/fat in total, at a physcial partition level. Ryan --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
