Joseph - You are one of those people who, if you have the time, actually seeks to understand things as deeply as possible. Thus I would be very interested in hearing what you have to say about Intel's Hyperthreading. A long time ago (say 5-7 years ago on the P4) I too had random issues but I never figured out what the root problem was, only that turning off HT fixed the "issues". I have not see any issues since then.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Joseph Sinclair <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice to see an on-topic post; thanks Mike. > > ---- > > Depends on what you want to learn and how stable you need it to be. > > For stable, I'd go with the latest Fedora, RHEL (and plan to upgrade to 6 > when it's out), or Debian stable (should be out soon). > > For more learning-on-the-edge I'd try sidux (In fact I'm doing that on my > laptop as soon as I have a few hours to run the install and tweak things). > It's Debian Sid (not terribly stable bleeding-edge) with some cleanup to make > it slightly less unstable, and a lot easier to install. > > The advantage: > Absolute bleeding edge Debian with the latest kernel, drivers, software, > etc... > Debian! > None of the *@&# Canonical and Gnome have dumped into Ubuntu that finally > persuaded me it's not worth the effort. > The Disadvantages: > Not as stable as official Debian releases (although it's pretty close to the > stability of Ubuntu or Fedora) > Always updating, so you have to create your own "release cycle" by choosing > when to update (which means watching the fora and updating when it's > relatively stable, then cherry-picking only important updates between times). > A lot less polished, so you'll have to learn a good bit more system > administration and other tasks the newer GUI tools cover over in the more > polished distros. > If it breaks, it's your problem. DO NOT run sidux on a line-of-business > system that can't be down for a few days if something goes wrong. > > ---- > > My next system will probably be an AMD 1090T (Hexacore!) or an Opteron > 12-core CPU (if I can afford that one). That is, unless a better CPU comes > out between now and when I scrape together the cash for a new "big" system. > I'll also probably load up 12G or more of RAM (the Opteron would support up > to 64G, IIRC). > I generally prefer the AMD chips, as they're a LOT cheaper per-core, and I've > had a lot of issues with Hyperthreading in Intel chips actually slowing > things down, but my workloads are not "normal", either. > > If I had $12K just laying around I'd probably pick up something like the > server system here > (http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/system/2U/2042/AS-2042G-6RF.cfm) with 4 > 12-core CPU, 128G RAM and 6 1TB drives (and do a bit of rewiring on the house > to support the dual 1200W power supplies). > > ---- > > As for what I'd recommend to someone NOT looking for a video > processor/compilation workhorse/VM host: > > If you want a Gaming monstrosity, check out the i7 980x for Intel > 6-core/12-thread bliss (although it costs $1000), and pair it with a nice > quartet of high-end Radeon GPU's (like a pair of HD 5970 or 4 HD 5870 cards) > in a crossfire setup. > The slight edge in single-thread performance on the i7 makes a difference > when building a rig for playing high-end video games, and for a high-end > gaming rig, CPU price shouldn't be a major concern (especially if you intend > to go whole-hog and enable maximum power-boost support with a phase-change > cooling setup). > > ---- > > If you want a true low-cost value system for 64-bit, however, try the new > Intel Atom D510 for 64-bit dual-core at a seriously low power usage (13 > watts, including graphics). It tops out, however, at 4G (and not all boards > support that), so 64-bit is more for style than real need. > For 1080p video playback, make sure to pick an ion2 system, although that > will require running the NVidia binary blobs and adds a few watts to the > power usage. > Just don't try to run virtual machines on it, as it lacks VT-x support. > > ---- > ==Joseph++ > > mike Enriquez wrote: >> I am planning to build a dual boot workstation. It will a 64bit computer >> with Windows 7 pro but I have yet to select a linux distro. >> I am open to any suggestions. Which linux distro would you use. My only >> requirement is that it further my linux education. >> I am willing to try any Linux Distro in workstation or server version. >> >> Also what would you put into your 64 bit computer? I am planning to use >> an i7 extreme processor on an MSI X58 pro-E motherboard. Ram is going to >> be DDR3 1600 MHz. >> >> I am open to any ideas. Please send me your ideas. >> >> Thanks >> >> Mike Enriquez >> --------------------------------------------------- >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> > > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
