James Dugger wrote:
I'm new to PLUG and new to LINUX but I have jumped in head first. By head first I mean I have removed XP off of 4 desktops and Vista off my HP Pavilion dv9000 laptop and installed Ubuntu 10.04 i386 on each. I have built an new headless server with and AMD Athelon (tripple core) 64bit chip and 2GB of DDR2 DRAM to be used as a file server, and print server to 3 printers. I have installed 3 - 1TB drives in a RAID 5 array (Configured as RAID on main board BIOS, no PCI controller) and software controlled using the OS which is Ubuntu 10.04 Server AMD 64bit.
I think you want to disable RAID on the MB, and let Linux handle the raid processing (aka software raid). I'm not sure what happens with the configuration you've described.
I am trying to configure the file server but with so many options and settings I admit that I am a bit lost. My file server will need to be accessible to a couple of work computers that run Windows. Also I have an Apple TV box that I am trying to convert to XBMC, the media for this will be stored on the file server. With this I have installed Samba onto my server and desktops. However I don't know if I should use samba (SMB) or CIFS for configuration. With several different mount points and different security settings for each mount point, is SMB or CIFS better? I want to minimize or more accurately centralize the administrative control of user access to the file server. I know there are different ways to accomplish this and wanted to ask what others have found to work best given the small size and scale of this network.
SMB and CIFS are pretty much the same thing. I could say simply that CIFS is 'better' (given that it's a newer dialect of SMB), but that would be misleading. Do some googling and you'll find links such as this: http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/SuSE/2007-03/msg01423.html
I am looking for recommendations in file server type (SMB, CIFS) and recommended configuration i.e. use of groups for users, passwords stored in database or text files and or matching user accounts in OS.
KISS. Use what's simple. In a home environment, centralized user accounts are overkill, and not simple (unless you're a seasoned *nix administrator). You might consider simply allowing guest access to everything, then tightening restrictions as you go.
I would use samba(CIFS) for windows access, NFS for linux access. Automounting is pretty slick with CentOS/RHEL, and I expect that Ubuntu has something similar. Also, you might consider using Netatalk for Mac access.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Welcome. -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
