On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:34 PM, R P Herrold <[email protected]> wrote:
> It and CentOS are almost indistinguishable to a sysadmin who i not a > distribution builder; the remaining principal of the distribution is: Connie > Sieh, who is a friend. the other long time member recently went to work at > Red Hat My understanding is that it's a limited release cycle to aid in stability from a development point of view. If the patch cycle is as quick as Cent/RHEL, it may be prod-ready. But saying "It's indistinguishable from CentOS" just makes me think "Why not just use CentOS then?" If it lacks any compelling, distinguishing feature , I don't know why I wouldn't use the ubiquitous, widely supported option. ~Ben --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
