Hi Mukund,

On Thursday 21 Oct 2004 12:03 pm, Mukund N Rathi wrote:
> Can someone please Explain me, in very very short cuz I have read that
> site, What's OSS,
Let me have a go at this. Though it might not be as short as you expected.
    Way back, things were simple and people freely shared their knowledge, 
including the clever ways they thought up for solving software problems. It 
didn't take too long though for some bunch of greedy and insecure programmer 
to put restrictions on the use of the knowledge that they distributed.
       This was like saying, I'll sell you books so that you may read them but 
only if you agree never to write books yourself because that would affect my 
book sales, also if you do, then I'll call you a thief, a pirate, because you 
would have written ideas that were based on mine which which you got from 
reading my books.
    One man named 'Richard Stallman' saw how wrong this was and so decided to 
dedicate his life to telling people about it and offering them an alternative 
that did not make slaves of the consumers of software. He and a group of like 
minded people started the free software foundation (FSF) and the GNU project, 
with the intention of creating and distributing software that came with the 
freedom to examine the internals, use it for any purpose that you might see 
fit, modify it to suit your needs and share it freely with your peers.
     In addition to this since the FSF realized that without proper 
protection, their efforts might get misused by the very same people to whose 
software they are offering an alternative to. So, they came up with the Gnu 
Public License (GPL). The GPL is a legal document, that states in legal terms 
all the freedoms that I mentioned above and also requires that when something 
is redistributed under the GPL it would give the recipeint the same freedoms 
that the provider got when she received a copy of the GPL'ed software. This 
effectively meant that companies would not be able to repackage and sell the 
efforts of the coders who wrote free software, without allowing users to do 
the same with their software. All this happened under the banner of 'Free 
Software'.
      Incidentally, Linus created the linux kernel and licensed it under GPL. 
Soon, a lot of people started using and distributing GNU software (which were 
as vast as the traditional Unix toolkit) running over the linux kernel. They 
just called such systems Linux. From then on, companies like RedHat and 
Mandrake, started formally packaging and selling systems like these calling 
them RedHat Linux or Mandrake Linux ..etc.
     Now, as the free software comunity grew, some people of the comunity who 
wanted to promote the idea of sharing the software noticed that they could 
not get the message across their 'pointy haired bosses (PHB's)' or directors 
on the board of software companies. They realized that the stupid suits just 
assumed that the 'free' in 'free software' referred to the price, which 
implied no cash/revenue/sales figures ...etc. They also noticed that some 
businesses would like to experiment with selling free software but were 
reluctant to go all the way and give the users all the freedoms. These 
members of the community decided that they would promote the idea of sharing 
the source code under the name 'Open Source Software'. They founded the OSS 
foundation which certified certain End User License Agreements (EULA) as 
being 'Open Source Compliant'. They did this, so that business who wanted to 
share source code had a choice of different licenses - including but not 
limited to the GPL.

Well, there is a lot more to this ....but I guess you have enough info to ask 
specific questions.

> and whether this group is a OSS users group or Linux 
> user group?
I don't know what it *is* ....but I think it was founded with the intention of 
being a general linux user group where talk about OSS and free software was 
also appreciated.


HTH
Regards
Steve
-- 
        Once, when the secrets of science were the jealously guarded property
of a small priesthood, the common man had no hope of mastering their arcane
complexities.  Years of study in musty classrooms were prerequisite to
obtaining even a dim, incoherent knowledge of science.
        Today all that has changed: a dim, incoherent knowledge of science is
available to anyone.
                -- Tom Weller, "Science Made Stupid"
--
______________________________________________________________________
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List:      ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
List Information:  http://plug.org.in/mailing-list/listinfo/plug-mail
Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.

Reply via email to