> Although I am not the moderator, I was present when the rules for > moderation were setup. Only the mails which have: > > 1. Improper format (not plain txt) > 2. Words like Win$ or MS$ > > are caught by filters. The rest of the mails are not even blocked for > moderation.
I was under impression that it is manually moderated. Mailing list that I used to administer locally, was moderated this way. I used to get notification for every incoming mail, and if I (as admin) allow it, it use to go to everyone who subscribed. Off course traffic was relatively low. (compared to PLUG) I guess with traffic like PLUG, manual administration is a huge overhead, if there is only single admin. May be multiple admins could share the load, if at all it is manually administered for moderation of mails. > Lastly, it is not the job of the admin to reformat mails, so ....... > please understand. Got it. I didn't expect the admins to do that anyway. About my original statement, Now I understand the logic behind bottom-posting (and why top-posting should be avoided) -DP -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) List Information: http://plug.org.in/mailing-list/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
