On 4/20/07, A G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I only hope that fsf does not do harm to OSS with SCOish arguments and claims.
What arguments? what claims? Can you enlight us with any? Your comparision of FSF with SCO tells us a *lot* about your knowledge on these topics. FYI, all FSF owned software is licensed under "GPL v2 (or later)". That means, if all *your* OSS fellows decide FSF is a shit, you can simply fork of all FSF software and maintain it on www.opensource.org. You can live as if FSF and GPLv3 never exists. Nobody can stop you and all the best! / bvk-chaitanya -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: ([email protected]) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
