On Nov 2, 2007 5:38 PM, ಓಂ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually I think we need not worry much about M$, because they will > dig their own resting place as the time passes... for all we know they > may have started in that direction with launch of Vista... >
Not really, if you carefully look at the XP licencing M$ is forcing an upgrade. > > 1. Define output expected (expected output) ... > 2. Check everybody's program... if it meets the requirement of > expected output then they get passing grade > 3. Count number of lines of actual code (excluding comments) in the > working program submitted and person whose code has minimum number of > lines gets highest grade... Point 3. is not a good criteria. Less lines of code doesnt mean good code. Its is not that easy. Secondly defining expected output is not easy (also not possible) at times. regards VK -- The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!!
-- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: ([email protected]) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
