On Jan 8, 2008 3:51 PM, Anoop John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > C# is the most advanced language (AFAIK). Why don't we have it on linux. We > > know that open source implementations are better that proprietary > > implementation (performance/memory usage,...). > Why did you say that C# is the most advanced language? What is it that > makes it better than C++? Aren't most of the differences because of > the .net framework?
There are lots of merits of the C# language that make it serious competition to Java, C++ and other languages that we've all used so far. At Thoughtworks, the growing feeling is that we're able to accomplish more with C# than with Java, and based on the clean code that I see my colleagues produce, I'm starting to get convinced. These are desktop and web service applications being put to use by customers from early on in the development cycle, and the developers have used Java in the past on equally demanding projects. I have heard these developers talk about features such as delegates, etc, but haven't really explored c# myself. I'd dabbled once with some interesting notions of transmitting objects (.NET remoting) but that's it. Here's more info on the c # language http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_Sharp The breadth of the library is a separate matter, and there, too .NET has much to offer. Again, my Java+.NET colleagues tell me that they find the .NET offerings to be more comprehensive. As a developer, I use Java and a little bit of Ruby, and have written COM components in the past for a living. I am considering looking at C# as the next language to have in my toolkit of languages. -- Sriram -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: ([email protected]) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
