On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Shridhar Daithankar <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 10:17:50 म.हा.सा.ग.र wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Shridhar Daithankar >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> i assume your CA is using licensed version of windows, if not, your >> >> task will be very easy...
if your CA is not using the licensed copy of windows, it will be easy to get him to switch to Linux because the advantages are multifold... he will be able to used licensed copy of his only needed favourite software *tally* without having to violate any laws about underlying Operating System... >> > That is a wrong solution and should not be considered at all. >> >> pray explain... how does spreading the message of being on the right >> side of the (already grayed out) law makes it a wrong solution? > > "it not, your task will be easy" is read as "pirate the software and use it", > which is wrong. > > If you meant anything otherwise, I didn't see it. Pray explain. The basic argument here being the infrastructure should be free मोफत . . . people will be willing to pay for what they specifically need for their profession... OS should be free because nobody will buy hardware otherwise. This argument has a rather deep meaning... which supports why things came into existence on Free and OSS front, but that again is a perception.... till i say i want to rule the world this way :-) The difficult scenario, if the CA has both Windows and Tally licensed it will be difficult for to get to switch because by switching to Linux he will be writting off him money (the sense of his having already paid money spent on OS& software working for him).. if this is not simple please say it again and i will grind my brain to make it simpler.... -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: ([email protected]) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [email protected] for mailing instructions.
