yes i also use an all-in-one linux server at home with portslave. there is, however, an ipmasq dcc module that i've used--which works. irc has worked with an ipmasq server as i have tested but sometimes irc servers (undernet, particularly) do not allow several connections coming from one ip add (kasi magmumukang all of them are on the same pc). [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>i think you can do this by setting up ip masquerading on the dialup server (or any >other server that the dialup server can access). since you're setting up masquerading >the other way around, i think you'll have to use ip alias on your lan (ewan ko, >theoretically...). after this set the proper routes on the dialup server so 192.168.* >can access the internet/ >> >>it would be much cleaner of you created the mail server your masquerading server and >use a 486/low end pc for dialups. use radius/portslave for your dialup. >http://www.skyinet.net/~onogos/docs (look for the portslave howto. >> >>hmm...this is actually a good idea, most dialup accounts do not really need >individual public ips....unless they use irc... > >yup, i've personally seen setups using only one linux box for all of the above, >portslave, radius, smtp, pop, samba, ipmasq. >actually, you can use irc and even icq thru ipmasq. >i think there are some problems using dcc though. > >peace! >-ericr > >- >Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph >To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
