On Sat, 13 May 2000 at 16:51, Miguel A.L. Paraz wrote:
>I'm sorry but I'm (ironically) too busy to read the PLUG list except on
>spare time due to the humongous amount of work I have. Grace is also
>tied up.
Understandable, and as the PLUG community grows (and we sure darned hope
so!) we presume traffic will grow too, and therefore the time required to
moderate, or even just read all the posts will surely move from being
plainly too expensive to pay for to being an outright herculean task.
>We've ended up with a situation where the PLUG is an online social
>community of its own, and perhaps you find the posts objectionable. If
>we are to do something about that, I'm afraid one or two people are not
>enough to be representative of the spirit of what the community thinks.
I think this brings us to the issue of should PLUG be moderated? I
personally like Migs' considering PLUG as an "online social community".
We're a bunch of people, social animals, bound together (hopefully) by a
common interest in Linux.
Personally I'd go for "anything goes". But considering the havoc that
might create, perhaps we can go for what Migs proposed? Let's come up with
a simple set of rules that we all do our best to abide by and uphold.
Perhaps we can all be "officers of the law". I don't know. Just my two
cents. :-)
-+[ Jijo Sevilla ]+-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
