On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 15:33 +0800, JM Ibanez wrote:
> On 12/16/05, Dominique Cimafranca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > So, IBM won't be exclusive with Novell/SuSE? I thought they were tight.
> >
> > IBM was never exclusive with any distro.  I think they learned their lesson
> > with You-Know-Who.  That said, I always thought that SuSE was more
> > responsive than Red Hat in getting hardware certifications done, and that is
> > why the relationship might be perceived as 'tight.'
> >
> > Anyways, the article looks more like a press release.  Par for the course in
> > this business.
> 
> Next question: How can other distros apply or enter such a
> relationship with IBM?
> 

These distro's should give IBM enough monetary incentive on the business
side of things to be able to even let IBM consider a distro.

Meaning, if distro A has potential to give IBM $ XX Million in the next
Y years, then maybe distro A can stand a chance against SuSE or RedHat.

That's just my $0.02 worth.

-- 
Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key 0x08AE6EAC
http://mikhailberis.blogspot.com/
Mobile: +63 9287291459

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to