Heya Michael! :-) On 2/11/06, Michael Calizo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > its not wat I wanted.. kasi clone yan e.. Im looking for an "ORIG" > RHEL4.
Huh? Why do you need an `ORIG' RHEL 4? What is `orig' for that matter, if other implementations of RHEL (such as CentOS or WhiteBox) can give you almost the exact same system sans the RHEL logos? Yes, the latter distros are clones, but that doesn't mean that they're any less RHEL than the official distribution, source-code-wise. Yes, they're different distributions, and yes, there's no binary compatibility guaranteed between them (ever!!!), but your workstation users (well, you, at any rate) won't even have to mind that. Anyhow, looking for such is not the fare for this mailing list; I don't think many of us here tolerate continuing copyright infringement (although I suppose many are still (forced) using bootleg pirated crap, some of which are so good that there aren't FOSS equivalents yet :S). Cheers, Zakame -- Zak B. Elep || http://zakame.spunge.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
