cisco has its way of QoS and ToS, not same as linux but Cisco can handle QoS


On 4/6/06, Paul Patrick Carpio Prantilla < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rogelio Serrano wrote:
>
> there is no way you can stop p2p. when the packets are all encrypted
> then you are stumped.
>
> You can use the suggested solutions but you cant stop them all. And it
> takes only one guy to successfully connect to any p2p network and hog
> all your bandwidth.
>
> The only way is limit bandwidth. You should try to look at htb and
> cfq. but this is hair pulling territory. YMMV.
>

Hello Rogelio,

Agreed here, QoS and traffic shaping is the way to go IMHO. If I had to
pick one over the other, I'd definitely pick HTB over CBQ and attach a
stochastic fair queueing discipline at the leaves of each class. Works
great. Furthermore, my colleagues and I have consistently experienced
strange behavior from CBQ.

By the way, I've been meaning to replace one of my organization's main
PC routers with a cisco router. Problem is, this is where most of my HTB
scripts and content filtering resides. I know this is OT, but I'd like
to take this opportunity to ask if anyone here has had experience with
QoS in IOS? Specifically, I'm wondering if it's capable of everything
HTB is capable of doing. Admittedly, I still have to read up on this
particular IOS function thoroughly. Any feedback and gotchas will be
greatly appreciated though.

-Paul
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph



--
Jagi C. Sarcilla
System Engineer
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to