On 12/20/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, rexonf wrote: > They are participating in shared ownership of the code, this is > communist.... and is independent of maximising profit. So if we follow this logic, Christianity is communist because it encourages -- in fact mandates in certain cases -- sharing. Give me a break.
Christianity certainly has a communist aspect. Does Christianity encourage the accumulation of capital? From my 12 years experience I don't recall any such. Sharing ownership is NOT communist. STATE control and ownership IS. The
state does not really share. That is how communism is practiced (Stalinism, Maoism, orthodox communism, etc.).
I think the first post already noted a difference between Stalinism and communism.
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
