On 12/22/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, rexonf wrote: No it's not. Sharing of a resource is not eclusive to communism. It is also Christian and democratic. You are abstracting one small -- and non-unique -- part of communism and using it as a basis for definition. That is a logical error.
There is no logical error.
Communism doesn't work in the GPL at all, becuase none of the GPL is communist. Using characteristics that are not unique to communism as a means to identify something as communist also involves a logical error. Using the same thinking, one can argue that the GPL is democratuic, capitalist, Christian, Jewish, etc.
You cannot use your proposition as an argument. If the GPL said something like share the code for the Glory of God then we can say that the GPL is Christian :-)
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
