SpamAssassin can perform well if you get it updated with the latest rulesets, try going to surbl.org there are instructions and several rulesets to improve SpamAssassins capability to fight spam.
On 11/21/06, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/17/06, Mhac Janapin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > How's the performance of Spamassin with Scalix? Are you happy with it's > anti-spamming? Hello Mhac, I can't really say how it goes well with a larger deployment since we only have less than 20 users and the email service is only used for work-related purposes - we don't really get that much mail coming in from other domains and for our domains we have a whitelist on the Scalix server. I think this is more of a Spamassassin-specific query because whether it's with Scalix or Postfix or any other MTA - Spamassassin, I think, would still perform it's spam-identification routine the same way (there might be speed differences though). Best regards, Matt -- Stand before it and there is no beginning. Follow it and there is no end. Stay with the ancient Tao, Move with the present. _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
-- Deo Dax S. Cordova Linux Specialist codehaxor outsourcing industries +639163148590
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
