Hello, Try this link: http://linux-ha.org
On 3/19/07, Ramer Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi pluggers, We are running our proxy server on an aging 1U-chassis Dell server installed with RH9.0. Performance, over the years, has been satisfactory. But during our operations review, the management identified it as a single-point of failure, should the box goes down, some segment of our network will not be able to reach the internet. We want to implement a highly-available web cache solution using squid. There was an initial attempt (the sys admin originally handling this has resigned) to configure 2 x Dell 1850 with RH ES3.0, heartbeat and ipfail but the behavior is not very satisfactory - they only detect when the network goes down, no service fail-over will occur when other resources caused the problem. I'm reading Linux Virtual Server tutorial from http://www.ultramonkey.org and I think there's a way to expand the cluster's configuration (to include more resources under cluster control). But I would like to ask if anybody has implemented a linux-based web-cache cluster. Perhaps I can replicate your approach rather than work from the ground up. * An active-passive solution is acceptable. * Content filtering is not necessary (the cluster will be deployed in front of the application servers, this is not for human users). * The cluster solution should monitor at least the following resources - network interface, the health of squid daemon, and the disk partitions used by squid. Thanks in advance. -ramer- _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
-- Regards, Martin Acupanda
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
