On 8/2/07, Lois Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is Joomla!, Drupal, XOOPS..
But these are not wikis. :P Also, Drupal is more a framework than *just* another CMS. (Sorry, big Drupal fanboy here. Heh.) > > Working with MediaWiki is real easy as a user. I was just wondering how it > is from an admin's pov, installation and maintenance. MediaWiki is stable enough, but like all software, you have to keep up to date with security patches and what not. Just the usual admin work will do. FWIW, at the workplace, we use TWiki, though -- Perl is so much better than PHP, from *my* (admin) perspective, at least. Plus, flat files are always good, unlike with MediaWiki, where you also have to maintain the DB backend, which always requires extra work. But hey, we get paid to do it, right? ;) -- Ian Dexter R. Marquez http://iandexter.net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://feeds.feedburner.com/Coredump _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
