EMF changes tune, hails embedded Linux
Dec. 05, 2007
http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9372729455.html

Embedded Market Forecasters has issued a report claiming that embedded 
Linux is just as dependable as other real-time operating systems (RTOSes). 
The independently funded report appears to recant EMF's controversial 
Microsoft-funded report in 2003 that claimed that embedded Windows OSes 
were far faster and cheaper than embedded Linux.

The updated report now claims that projects using embedded Linux have 
achieved design parity with commercial RTOSes for most projects, offering 
the same level of design outcomes. The Framingham, Mass. researchers also 
state that Linux designs are capable of being incorporated within 
mission-critical applications that require MILS (Multiple Independent 
Levels of Security) or EAL (Evaluation Assurance Level) certification.

The EMF report's positive findings about Linux are limited to commercial 
embedded Linux distributions, however. The report says the study found 
that 15.9 percent fewer "in-house" Linux development projects met 
"pre-design expectation levels," compared to projects using a commercial 
embedded Linux or certified RTOS.

Background

EMF's original 2003 research report hit like a bombshell in the Linux 
community, at a time when embedded Linux was being hyped at the same 
dizzying levels accorded to "Web 2.0" over the last year. EMF claimed that 
Windows CE .NET and Windows XP Embedded ran 43 percent faster and at 68 
percent lower cost, on average, compared with similar projects using 
embedded Linux. The report has now been updated, says EMF "in light of the 
many changes which have occurred since 2003 in embedded development 
technology."

The 2003 study set off a firestorm of debate, based not only on the 
content, but by the Redmond, Wash.-based funding source. (EMF says the new 
report was funded solely by its general subscribers.) At the time, 
LinuxDevices published some editorials that crowed over the bursting of 
the embedded Linux hype bubble, yet also responded by printing several 
rebuttals, in which a typical comment was Jerry Epplin's contention that 
the report was "flawed on just about every level."

EMF says the new report is based on interviews with more than 1,300 
embedded developers in 2006 and 2007 across a broad range of embedded 
vertical market applications. (By contrast, the 2003 survey interviewed 
only 100 manufacturers and 456 embedded developers.) EMF's new survey 
asked for information such as current and anticipated tool usage, design 
starts, completions and cancellations, host development and target 
platforms, and microprocessors. The analysis was also based on time from 
design start to shipment, percent of designs completed behind schedule, 
number of months delayed, design complexity, and comparisons to pre-design 
expectations.

Stated report author Dr. Jerry Krasner, "This study shows that designing 
with an embedded Linux OS can be as dependable as designing with an RTOS. 
The availability of general and application-specific tool sets has enabled 
designs that are on-time and close to pre-design expectations. However, 
these results are specific to commercial embedded Linux and RTOSes, and 
were not experienced to the same extent by in-house Linux development 
efforts."

Availability

The full report, called "Embedded Linux Total Cost of Development 
Analyzed" is available from EMF's web site. Also available on demand are 
customized cross-tab reports, according to an EMF spokesperson.


-- 
Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to
do what we ought. -- Pope John Paul II

--[Manny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
       Alternative Information and Opinion at http://www.phnix.net
               Advocacy blog: http://mamador.wordpress.com
            Personal website: http://mannyamador.multiply.com
--[Pro-Life Philippines]-------------------[http://www.prolife.org.ph]--
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to