in related news.... FTA: http://www.heise-online.co.uk/news/Intel-e1000e-user-Don-t-install-the-new-SUSE-betas--/111583
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i agree. but informing the IPW2100 users about the problem works in > two ways and the outcome is far better than by simply marking it as > obsolete :) > > On 9/21/08, Zak B. Elep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> FTBP: > >> http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/blog/devel/other/2008_09_21.html<http://tservice.net.ru/%7Es0mbre/blog/devel/other/2008_09_21.html> > >> > >> "[...]Also added couple of jokes about conspiracy theories (like bug > fires > >> because Intel forces us to buy a new adapter by this error) to make it a > >> little bit more flameable and to bring attention. I really hope Intel > does > >> not do it intentionally. " > > > > Reading the LKML,[0] it look like mjg59's got the right solution[1] > > (as usual:) try to really fix the code rather than making a lot of > > noise about it. I do understand Evgeniy's side though (4 years > > sitting on such a situation would probably get to anyone's nerves, > > especially when said device is fast becoming obsolete.) > > > > [0] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/21/51 > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/21/164 > > > > -- > > Zak B. Elep || http://zakame.spunge.org > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D > > _________________________________________________ > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > > >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
