Why not alfresco? Or why not foss? I asked the same thing. Inasmuch as i want foss, sometimes people are put in a position where they dont have the resources to do something, to test things out, etc. Thtas why they go for paid software as you get support and a consultant who you can talk to you about best practices and stuff like that. Unless you got a top-notch sysad team and the resources sometimes you gotta get a temp non-free solution until you can understand the system as it should be. then when you're a bit more stable feel free!
im probbaly going that route because i need to baseline my understanding of my needs with my environment first; and i have an environment that is better left to the experts (where less than 100% uptime is a grave situation) plus i dont want to experience another one of those long nights reading logs because there is no one else to do it -- dont get me worng though, id go foss if i had the resources to do it. alfresco does look good. ill take a look at it. On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Confluence is good! we use it internally for a lot of things. > > It uses Coherence in the back end :-) > > $11K/year isn't expensive as software goes though. Stellent is like > $100K/CPU + $22K/year support. > > > > > -- > Orlando Andico > +63.2.976.8659 | +63.920.903.0335 > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
